This post considers ways to further evaluate the engagement of your userbase, and suggests ways to leverage that to optimize your game.
This post examines when users are most likely to convert on install day, and what their main motivations to convert are. Treating your game as if it were an IP means identifying what its defining traits are, and what is most likely to appeal to your users. This exercise can in turn help you design starter packs that align with your users expectations and help you get your conversion numbers up.
Glu had a solid Q2 – driven in large part by the performance of Tap Sports Baseball ’18. This post digs a little deeper into how TSB created a strong mobile experience for baseball and MLB fans.
Engagement and monetization are two key aspects of the success of a mobile game. But how are both interrelated? Bouncing off some remarks in the Q&A of EA’s quarterly report, I discuss different ways to (potentially) make sense of all this.
Some of your payers will churn after spending for the first time in your game. And payers converting on install day are those who churn the most.
This post tries to make sense of this, and further suggests how you can leverage this to understand conversion and monetization better, and design your monetization strategy accordingly.
Generally, users who convert on install day will be your highest paying customers. This post argues that your best payers don’t convert to be stronger, win more or progress faster. I also suggest ways to design your day 0 monetization with that in mind.